lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091117132358.GJ12736@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:23:58 +0100
From:	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hpa@...or.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, mgarski@...t.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbd: (#7063) make CapsLock work as expected even for non-ASCII

Alexey Dobriyan, le Tue 17 Nov 2009 14:55:03 +0300, a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:15:20AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Alexey Dobriyan, le Tue 17 Nov 2009 02:05:23 +0300, a écrit :
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:54:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Samuel Thibault, le Mon 16 Nov 2009 23:27:38 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > > > My keymap contains
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 				keycode 44 = +z
> > > > > > 		shift           keycode 44 = +Z
> > > > > > 	altgr                   keycode 44 = U+044F        # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YA
> > > > > > 	altgr   shift           keycode 44 = U+042F        # CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER YA
> > > > > 
> > > > > And U+044F / U+042F is not KT_LETTER.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, there's no way you can express a unicode character in KT_LETTER.
> > > > > Limited interface, but that's not a reason to break other interfaces.
> > > > 
> > > > One way to go would be to decrete that keysyms between 0xD800 and 0xE000
> > > 
> > > And this is going to help me with U+042F/U+044F how?
> 
> > --- a/drivers/char/keyboard.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/keyboard.c
> > @@ -1258,6 +1258,15 @@ static void kbd_keycode(unsigned int keycode, int down, int hw_raw)
> >  	type = KTYP(keysym);
> >  
> >  	if (type < 0xf0) {
> > +		if (keysym >= 0xD800 && keysym < 0xE000) {
> 
> keysym is 0x044F at this point.

I'm precisely suggesting that instead of 0x044F, the keymap provides
0xdc4f, just like for +z the keysym is not K(KT_LATIN,0x0079), but
K(KT_LETTER,0x79) (that's the difference between just z and +z, i.e.
whether it's KT_LATIN or KT_LETTER, i.e. whether capslock acts on it or
not, that's the whole point of capslock vs shift lock!).

More precisely, in the kbd source code, in the add_capslock function, in
the unicode case, instead of ignoring the '+', add 0xD800 to the unicode
value if it is below 0x0800.

But again, that's a very limited fix and just fixing the LED interface
would allow to just use modifiers and permit much more powerful keymaps.

Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ