linux-kernel - Re: Jiffies jumping with the x86 HPET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B02AD9B.5040105@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:05:15 +0300
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	Lee Merrill <lee_merrill@...oo.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Jiffies jumping with the x86 HPET

Lee Merrill wrote:
> We are seeing jiffies go forward occasionally, by 300 seconds, this it appears is due to the following code in the 2.6.16 kernel:
> 
> mark_offset_tsc_hpet(void):
> ...
> 1       hpet_current = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER);
> 2       rdtsc(last_tsc_low, last_tsc_high);
> 3
> 4       /* lost tick compensation */
> 5       offset = hpet_readl(HPET_T0_CMP) - hpet_tick;
> 6       if (unlikely(((offset - hpet_last) > hpet_tick) && (hpet_last != 0))
> 7                                       && detect_lost_ticks) {
> 8               int lost_ticks = (offset - hpet_last) / hpet_tick;
> 9               jiffies_64 += lost_ticks;
> 10      }
> 11      hpet_last = hpet_current;

There is no such code in current (2.6.31 or even 2.6.27.y) kernel.
Both hpet support and timer/clock code received huge changes in
2.6.24+ kernels.  I guess your best bet is to upgrade.

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/