[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911171857.01805.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:57:01 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] pata_sis: Implement MWDMA for the UDMA 133 capable chips
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 18:38:23 Alan Cox wrote:
> > > +static int mwdma_clip_to_pio(struct ata_device *adev)
> > > +{
> > > + const int mwdma_to_pio[3] = {
> > > + XFER_PIO_0, XFER_PIO_3, XFER_PIO_4
> > > + };
> > > + return min(mwdma_to_pio[adev->dma_mode - XFER_MW_DMA_0],
> > > + adev->pio_mode - XFER_PIO_0);
> > > +}
> >
> > This wants to be in the generic libata code.
>
> I'm not convinced because for the majority of drivers the libata timing
> interface handles it. SiS needs it just because it does things by
> precomputed tables. It's a one off interface.
Controllers based on *Intel* PIIX are in the disagreement with the above
paragraph and having generic helper to do conversion (without a clipping)
would bring us a little step closer to killing a needless code duplication
currently present in their ->set_piomode and ->set_dmamode methods.
[ In case somebody wonders: no, 'old' drivers don't have such duplication
and 'whoever did it didn't port it across' cause said 'whoever'-s were not
into the development of the square wheels.... ]
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists