[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440911171311s1313abf5h4059422b1214ec75@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:11:46 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/2009 12:10 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> The following lines have been removed:
>>>
>>> CPU: Physical Processor ID:
>>> CPU: Processor Core ID:
>>> CPU %d/0x%x -> Node %d
>>
>> please don't.
>>
>
> Why not?
>
> Or, more formally: please state the rationale for keeping them.
>
at least one distribution: SLES 11 mess it up when BSP is from socket
1 instead of socket0
and above message does show kernel think BSP still from socket0, and
other cores in that package are from socket1.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists