[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091117221125.25933.71150.stgit@bob.kio>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:11:25 -0700
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: davej@...hat.com
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: do not define acpi_processor_get_bios_limit() in
processor.h
If we provide a definition for acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(), we will
encounter build errors (multiple definitions of the function) when we
do not have CONFIG_CPU_FREQ configured.
We've already changed the modules that depend on this function to only
get built when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ is configured, so removing the definition
when unconfigured is safe.
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
---
include/acpi/processor.h | 5 -----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index c94f9f0..9db2159 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -318,11 +318,6 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr,
}
return 0;
}
-int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit)
-{
- return -ENODEV;
-}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
/* in processor_throttling.c */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists