[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091117061352.GE30852@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:13:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] x86 insn decoder test updates (Re: linux-next:
Tree for October 29 (x86 posttest))
* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:
> Here are the patches which update x86 instruction decoder build-time
> test. As Stephen reported on linux-next, sometimes objdump decodes bad
> instructions as normal. This will cause a false positive result on x86
> insn decoder test. This patches update the test as below;
>
> - Show more information with V=1
> - Show in which symbol the difference places.
> - Just warning instead of build failure.
yes, -tip testing was showing such build bugs too:
Error: ffffffff8104aae3: c5 83 3d 49 80 ee lds 0xffffffffee80493d(%rbx),%eax
Error: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 3 (attr:0)
it happens with older tools, such as binutils-2.17. Modern binutils
(2.19) is fine.
We dont want to remove the build error: it helped us fix a number of
real bugs in the decoder - instead please try to create a make based
workaround based on binutils, to not run the test with binutils older
than 2.19 or so.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists