[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B02565C.1030406@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:53:00 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
504391@...s.debian.org,
Wouter van Heyst <larstiq@...stiq.dyndns.org>,
Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: add module parameter to set whether cards are assumed
removable
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> In general, it is not possible to tell whether a card present in an MMC
> slot after resume is the same that was there before suspend.
That's true for virtually all storage devices, not just MMC.
> So there are two possible behaviours, each of which will cause data
> loss in some cases:
>
> CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=n (default): Cards are assumed to be removed
> during suspend. Any filesystem on them must be unmounted before
> suspend; otherwise, buffered writes will be lost.
>
> CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=y: Cards are assumed to remain present during
> suspend. They must not be swapped during suspend; otherwise, buffered
> writes will be flushed to the wrong card.
>
> Currently the choice is made at compile time and this allows that to be
> overridden at module load time.
Can't the kernel flush the write buffer at suspend time, so that you can
remove this choice for good?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= =-== =---=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists