[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1vdh7byva.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:07:21 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>, dedekind1@...il.com,
Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>,
Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dwm2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] panic-note: Annotation from user space for panics
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> writes:
> As much as I like kexec, it loses on memory footprint by about 100x.
> It's not appropriate for all use cases, especially things like
> consumer-grade wireless access points and phones.
In general I agree. The cost of a second kernel and initrd can be
prohibitive in the smallest systems, and if you do a crash capture
with using a standalone app that is reinventing the wheel.
That said. I can happily run kdump with only 16M-20M reserved.
So on many systems the cost is affordable.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists