[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B043467.8000708@am.sony.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:52:39 -0800
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>,
"dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>,
Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
"linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org" <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"dwm2@...radead.org" <dwm2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] panic-note: Annotation from user space for panics
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> writes:
>
>> As much as I like kexec, it loses on memory footprint by about 100x.
>> It's not appropriate for all use cases, especially things like
>> consumer-grade wireless access points and phones.
>
> In general I agree. The cost of a second kernel and initrd can be
> prohibitive in the smallest systems, and if you do a crash capture
> with using a standalone app that is reinventing the wheel.
>
> That said. I can happily run kdump with only 16M-20M reserved.
> So on many systems the cost is affordable.
Understood. On some of my systems, the memory budget for the
entire system is 10M. On most systems I work with, it is a
struggle to reserve even 64K for this feature.
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists