| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091118180859.GA2683@liondog.tnic>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:08:59 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:18:09AM -0800, Mike Travis wrote:
> There are other patches that deal with these:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/tip/15cd8812ab2ce62a2f779e93a8398bdad752291a
> http://git.kernel.org/tip/b01c845f0f2e3f9e54e6a78d5d56895f5b95e818
yep, it looks better now, thanks:
CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
mce: CPU supports 6 MCE banks
using C1E aware idle routine
...
Booting Node 0, Processors #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Ok.
Booting Node 1, Processors #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 Ok.
Booting Node 3, Processors #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 Ok.
Booting Node 2, Processors #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 Ok.
Brought up 24 CPUs
Total of 24 processors activated (81398.64 BogoMIPS).
> >and clearly CPU cache info is too verbose. We might want to
> >kill it since we have it replicated in /sysfs. In that case,
> >arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:display_cacheinfo() could become obsolete
> >and we could remove it... Or is there some reason for dumping that
> >particular information during boot?
> >
>
> Yes, the above patches remove them entirely.
In that case, maybe a small fixlet like the following is in order:
--
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:01:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86, cpu: mv display_cacheinfo -> cpu_detect_cache_sizes
display_cacheinfo() doesn't display anything anymore and it is solely
used to detect CPU cache sizes for /proc/cpuinfo. Rename it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/transmeta.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index c910a71..7128b37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
}
}
- display_cacheinfo(c);
+ cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
/* Multi core CPU? */
if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000008) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c
index c95e831..e58d978 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void __cpuinit init_c3(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD);
}
- display_cacheinfo(c);
+ cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
}
enum {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 61242a5..9bf845d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ void __init setup_cpu_local_masks(void)
static void __cpuinit default_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- display_cacheinfo(c);
+ cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
#else
/* Not much we can do here... */
/* Check if at least it has cpuid */
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static void __cpuinit get_model_name(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
}
}
-void __cpuinit display_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+void __cpuinit cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
unsigned int n, dummy, ebx, ecx, edx, l2size;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
index 6de9a90..3624e8a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
@@ -32,6 +32,6 @@ struct cpu_dev {
extern const struct cpu_dev *const __x86_cpu_dev_start[],
*const __x86_cpu_dev_end[];
-extern void display_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
+extern void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c
index 19807b8..4fbd384 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void __cpuinit init_nsc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
/* Handle the GX (Formally known as the GX2) */
if (c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model == 5)
- display_cacheinfo(c);
+ cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
else
init_cyrix(c);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/transmeta.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/transmeta.c
index bb62b3e..2800074 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/transmeta.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/transmeta.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static void __cpuinit init_transmeta(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
early_init_transmeta(c);
- display_cacheinfo(c);
+ cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
/* Print CMS and CPU revision */
max = cpuid_eax(0x80860000);
--
1.6.5
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists