[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1258524056.2140.662.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:00:56 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: michael@...erman.id.au
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] powerpc: Fix minor build issues on 2.6.32-rc7
without CONFIG_XICS set
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 23:52 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> In fact this series makes me wonder whether we can drop support for a
> single kernel image with pseries XICS & MPIC support.
Nope. Not happening. We should just hide CONFIG_XICS just like
CONFIG_MPIC, it should be select'ed by the platform (which today is only
pseries but that might change).
> If we could drop that requirement we could have a single set of names,
> ie. API, for the irq routines and build either the XICS or MPIC
> versions.
And so we would have the ability to build a kernel that supports in a
single binary every platform, as is the case today, ie, pseries,
powermac, pa6t, cell, etc... _BUT_ for pseries support, we would have to
choose at compile time whether to support old or new machines ? Sounds
backward to me :-)
> That would avoid all the code that needs a setup_foo_xics() and
> setup_foo_mpic() - it'd just be setup_foo(), implemented by either the
> XICS or MPIC code.
And that would save us what ? one page on a pSeries machine ? yeah !
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists