[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1258636872.4372.354.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:21:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@...bigcorporation.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: yield() in i2c non-happy paths hits BUG under -rt patch
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 14:11 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > You say "NOOP by default", does this imply there is a way to change
> > this?
>
> There is a sysctl: sysctl_sched_compat_yield
This makes yield() place current behind all other tasks, and sucks too
for some workloads.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists