[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B055A9B.1090502@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:47:55 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Patrick Mullaney <pmullaney@...ell.com>,
Edge Virtual Bridging <evb@...oogroups.com>,
Anna Fischer <anna.fischer@...com>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
virtualization@...ux-foundation.com,
Jens Osterkamp <jens@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] macvlan: Reflect macvlan packets meant for other
macvlan devices
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 19 November 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> It seems that we should never drop dst then. We either forward the frame to
>>> netif_rx or to dev_queue_xmit, and from how I read it now, we want to keep
>>> the dst in both cases.
>> When we loop back on our selves we certainly need to have dst clear because
>> we don't know how to cache routes through multiple network namespaces.
>
> Ah, right. So should I add the explicit dst_drop to the new dev_forward_skb()
> then? The veth driver doesn't need it, but it also looks like it won't hurt.
Yes, I think that should be fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists