[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091119164233.GA8476@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:42:33 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@...citrix.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not read IIR in serial8250_start_tx when
UART_BUG_TXEN
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:38:55PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> > The patch below has been lost several times (the last submission happened
> > probably on [1]). I am currently aware of a real hardware which triggers
> > this problem quite reliably, so we should rather have that really fixed.
> >
> > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/12/379
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@...citrix.com>
> >
> > Do not read IIR in serial8250_start_tx when UART_BUG_TXEN
> >
> > Reading the IIR clears some oustanding interrupts so it is not safe.
> > Instead, simply transmit immediately if the buffer is empty without
> > regard to IIR.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@...citrix.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/serial/8250.c | 8 +++-----
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/serial/8250.c b/drivers/serial/8250.c
> > index 737b4c9..807042b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/serial/8250.c
> > +++ b/drivers/serial/8250.c
> > @@ -1339,14 +1339,12 @@ static void serial8250_start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
> > serial_out(up, UART_IER, up->ier);
> >
> > if (up->bugs & UART_BUG_TXEN) {
> > - unsigned char lsr, iir;
> > + unsigned char lsr;
> > lsr = serial_in(up, UART_LSR);
> > up->lsr_saved_flags |= lsr & LSR_SAVE_FLAGS;
> > - iir = serial_in(up, UART_IIR) & 0x0f;
> > if ((up->port.type == PORT_RM9000) ?
> > - (lsr & UART_LSR_THRE &&
> > - (iir == UART_IIR_NO_INT || iir == UART_IIR_THRI)) :
> > - (lsr & UART_LSR_TEMT && iir & UART_IIR_NO_INT))
> > + (lsr & UART_LSR_THRE) :
> > + (lsr & UART_LSR_TEMT))
> > transmit_chars(up);
> > }
> > }
>
> Does anyone have any comments about this please?
>
> In a nutshell -- this is needed so that we make the UART_BUG_TXEN really
> harmless (which I guess it originally inteded to be, but reading IIR has
> some unwanted sideeffects and is in fact not needed).
>
> We need to have this in to handle properly the cases in which BUG_TXEN is
> misdetected, and we can't blacklist such systems as we do for some SoL
> hardware (see commit b6adea334c6c (" 8250: fix boot hang with serial
> console when using with Serial Over Lan port"). Also there doesn't seem to
> be any straightforward way to workaround the misdetection, so this seems
> to be proper fix, unbreaking all the possible scenarios.
>
> Alan, Greg, any comments?
At first glance, it looks acceptable to me. It's in my "to-apply" queue
that has gotten a bit big due to "real work" and a vacation I took last
week.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists