[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091119030302.GB4970@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:03:03 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: build ftrace.o when CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is
set for s390
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:40:44PM -0500, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> Trying to build a s390x kernel with CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS will fail
> because ftrace.o is not built/linked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> --- linus-2.6.orig/arch/s390/kernel/Makefile 2009-10-30 17:49:10.000000000 -0400
> +++ linus-2.6/arch/s390/kernel/Makefile 2009-11-18 15:39:52.000000000 -0500
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER) += $(if $(CONFIG_64BIT),mcount64.o,mcount.o)
> obj-$(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER) += ftrace.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS) += ftrace.o
>
> # Kexec part
> S390_KEXEC_OBJS := machine_kexec.o crash.o
>
Thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
We probably want this patch for .32
Not sure in which tree it best fits though, -tip or s390?
(Adding more people in Cc).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists