[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de8d50360911191036s2f7a1da7p8da59ab248c77d11@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:36:08 -0800
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
feng.tang@...el.com, "Fr??d??ric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jakub@...hat.com,
gcc@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> It has to align the entire stack? Why not just the variable within the
> stack?
I had proposed a patch which just aligns the variable but that patch
was never really commented on and HJL's patches to realign the whole
stack went in afterwards.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists