lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:50:20 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: commit b00bc0b237055b breaking perf subsystem


commit b00bc0b237055b4c45816325ee14f0bd83e6f590
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date:   Mon Nov 2 13:01:56 2009 +0100

    uids: Prevent tear down race

has been bisected to break the perf system between -rc5 and -rc7;
and reverting this patch in rc7 also fixes the issue.

now this patch is.... fun and seemingly unrelated to perf, so I
am pretty sure something else is going on.

the symptom of the breakage is that a userland client of perf
(in my case, powertop) does not get to see new events if there
is only, say, one or two of them. The data_head pointer just does
not get updated.

Based on the patch, I have a suspicion that this pointer gets updated
from synchronize RCU context, and this patch just makes that happen
more.

If that is the case, what we really need is a new ioctl to perf that
will cause all pending buffer state to be flushed to the ring buffer,
that applications using perf can then just always call before looking
at the ring. As a concept, that sounds like a good idea to me anyway...

comments/suggestions/saying-I'm-full-of-sh*t ?



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ