[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B04C2AF.4040509@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:59:43 -0500
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] notifier atomic call chain notrace
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Jason Baron (jbaron@...hat.com) wrote:
>> Note that this is conditional on gcc >= 4.5. Also there is a !lockdep
>> condition. This is b/c the die_notifier takes an rcu_read_lock() on the
>> int3 trap, which then causes another one etc. Since, we aren't going to be
>> installing removing the handler, the rcu_read_lock() could be avoided for this
>> case with some code restructuring.
>>
> [snip]
>
> Would the following patch help ? I use it in the LTTng tree to alleviate
> this problem.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
The code itself seems OK for me. :-)
I'd just like to hear the opinion from Ingo, since
this change will change all atomic-notifier's locks to
notrace.
> notifier atomic call chain notrace
>
> In LTTng, being able to use the atomic notifier from cpu idle entry to
> ensure the tracer flush the last events in the current subbuffer
> requires the rcu read-side to be marked "notrace", otherwise it can end
> up calling back into lockdep and the tracer.
>
> Also apply to the the die notifier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> CC: mingo@...e.hu
> ---
> kernel/notifier.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/notifier.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/notifier.c 2009-11-12 17:58:56.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/notifier.c 2009-11-12 18:03:28.000000000 -0500
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ int atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(str
> spin_lock_irqsave(&nh->lock, flags);
> ret = notifier_chain_unregister(&nh->head, n);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nh->lock, flags);
> - synchronize_rcu();
> + synchronize_sched();
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(atomic_notifier_chain_unregister);
> @@ -178,9 +178,9 @@ int __kprobes __atomic_notifier_call_cha
> {
> int ret;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> + rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace();
> ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, nr_to_call, nr_calls);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace();
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__atomic_notifier_call_chain);
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists