[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B05B6E3.6080604@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:21:39 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] pata: Update experimental tags
Hello.
Alan Cox wrote:
>> I'd suggest to address the delay by another, separate patch to both
>> pata_hpt37x and pata_hpt3x2n drivers, and accept Bart's original patch for
>> bit reversing...
>>
>
> If you can confirm the 371N is fine without switching to I/O cycles then
>
HPT371N datasheet says that the SRC1/2 registers are dual-mapped to
PCI and I/O space. Are you paranoid enough to want me to test the
drivers on the board with HPT371N too? :-)
> I agree entirely with that and I'll push the udelay(10) into all three
>
I can't say anything about pata_hpt36x, I don't think I have HPT
drivers that old...
> plus the drivers/ide one unless Bart beats me to it.
>
I could beat you to it as well. :-)
> Alan
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists