[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091119213935.GA11212@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:39:35 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: make /proc style symlinks behave like "normal"
symlinks
> > Adding all of the short comings to followlink that readlink has is a problem,
> > especially as followlink does much better now.
> >
> > At a practical level I think your changes are much easier to exploit than
> > Pavels contrived example.
> >
> > I really don't have any problems with your first patch to proc to add the
> > missing revalidate.
> >
>
> Thanks, that makes sense. The raciness was evident once you pointed it
> out, so I think you're correct that we can't take this approach.
>
> Adding the missing revalidations is fine, but I don't believe that
> helps to fix Pavel's issue. I'll go back and take a more careful look
> at the suggestion that Miklos made and see whether it makes sense to
> implement a new FS_* flag for this, and see what it'll take to fix
> Pavel's issue.
One posibility would be to make open(/proc/XX/fd/XX) behave like
dup(). That should solve the NFS problems, too, no?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists