[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091119223018.GC11212@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:30:18 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: make /proc style symlinks behave like "normal"
symlinks
Hi!
(Sorry, missed Cc's first time).
> >> Adding the missing revalidations is fine, but I don't believe that
> >> helps to fix Pavel's issue. I'll go back and take a more careful look
> >> at the suggestion that Miklos made and see whether it makes sense to
> >> implement a new FS_* flag for this, and see what it'll take to fix
> >> Pavel's issue.
> >
> > One posibility would be to make open(/proc/XX/fd/XX) behave like
> > dup(). That should solve the NFS problems, too, no?
>
> Not for bind mounts, and the revalidate in follow_mounts is a bug regardless.
Really? So dup() is also broken on nfs? How do bind mounts affect
dup()?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists