[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B0653E0.5090407@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:31:28 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Remove kmemtrace tracer
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> 于 2009年11月20日 16:20, Pekka Enberg 写道:
>>> Li Zefan kirjoitti:
>>>> The kmem trace events can replace the functions of kmemtrace
>>>> tracer.
>>>>
>>>> And kmemtrace-user can be modified to use trace events.
>>>> (But after cloning the git repo, I found it's still based on
>>>> the original relay version..), not to mention now we have
>>>> 'perf kmem' tool.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
>>> NAK for the time being. "perf kmem" output is not yet as good as that of
>>> kmemtrace-user.
>>>
>> But is the current kmemtrace-user based on kmemtrace?
>>
>> From the git repo:
>> http://repo.or.cz/w/kmemtrace-user.git
>>
>> I found it's still based on relay.
>
> The "ftrace-temp" branch seems to have the ftrace based version in it. Eduard?
>
Thanks. I just overlooked the branch..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists