[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B068EBF.9020403@atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:42:39 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AT91 Kconfig rework
Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> This is AT91 Kconfig rework for next merge window. After
>> discussing it on the mailing-list and Ack by Andrew Victor, I
>> send you this patchset. You can pull it from:
>>
>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk
>
> FYI:
>
> $ git pull git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk
> remote: Counting objects: 41, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (28/28), done.
> remote: Total 30 (delta 26), reused 2 (delta 2)
> Unpacking objects: 100% (30/30), done.
>>>From git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91
> * branch for-rmk -> FETCH_HEAD
> Auto-merging arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> Recorded preimage for 'arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig'
> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
> $ git diff-files -u
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index 2fd8843,3df124e..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@@ -320,7 -337,7 +337,11 @@@ config MACH_AT91SAM9G20E
>
> config MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC
> bool "Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit with 2 SD/MMC Slots"
> ++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> + depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9G20
> ++=======
> + select HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
> ++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> help
> Select this if you are using an Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit
> with 2 SD/MMC Slots. This is the case for AT91SAM9G20-EK rev. C and
> @@@ -394,7 -411,7 +415,11 @@@ config MTD_AT91_DATAFLASH_CAR
>
> config MTD_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
> bool "Enable 16-bit data bus interface to NAND flash"
> ++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> + depends on (MACH_AT91SAM9260EK || MACH_AT91SAM9261EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G10EK || MACH_AT91SAM9263EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC || MACH_AT91SAM9G45EKES || MACH_AT91CAP9ADK)
> ++=======
> + depends on HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
> ++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> help
> On AT91SAM926x boards both types of NAND flash can be present
> (8 and 16 bit data bus width).
>
> What's the resolution? I think the first is just to include both, but
> the second looks like the first depends needs deleting to leave only the
> second?
Well, in fact the resolution for both is to keep the second line only.
Thanks.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists