linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (pohmelfs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091120015317.GB6028@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:17 +0800
From:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and
	congestion checks (pohmelfs)

Hi Evgeniy,

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:04:13PM +0800, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> H1.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:11:54PM +0800, Wu Fengguang (fengguang.wu@...el.com) wrote:
> > Will you pick up this updated patch? It also removes the unused bdi.
> 
> I'm ok with the changes, but I suppose it should be pushed as a single
> patchet into the tree, no?

Either way works. I would submit a single patchset that includes the
generic ones and the fs specific patches that have not been picked up
into their fs tree :)

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/