[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911210239.DCI56207.HQFOVOJOSLMFFt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:39:51 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: john.johansen@...onical.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor #3 0/12] AppArmor security module
Hello.
Sorry for late response.
I browsed apparmorfs-24.c apparmorfs.c audit.c capability.c context.c domain.c .
Comments are shown below.
> static int aa_audit_base(int type, struct aa_profile *profile,
> struct aa_audit *sa, struct audit_context *audit_cxt,
> void (*cb) (struct audit_buffer *, void *))
(...snipped...)
> if (profile && PROFILE_KILL(profile) && type == AUDIT_APPARMOR_DENIED)
> type = AUDIT_APPARMOR_KILL;
PROFILE_KILL(profile) includes profile != NULL checks.
Are you doing
profile && PROFILE_KILL(profile)
in order to ignore aa_g_profile_mode == APPARMOR_KILL if profile == NULL?
> int aa_restore_previous_profile(u64 token)
> {
> struct aa_task_context *cxt;
> struct cred *new = prepare_creds();
> if (!new)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> cxt = new->security;
> if (cxt->sys.token != token) {
> abort_creds(new);
I think simply returning -EACCES when trying to escape from some profile
gives hijacked process chances to do brute force attack.
Don't you need to kill the current process?
> return -EACCES;
> }
> static struct aa_profile *x_to_profile(struct aa_namespace *ns,
> struct aa_profile *profile,
> const char *name, u16 xindex)
(...snipped...)
> case AA_X_TABLE:
> if (index > profile->file.trans.size) {
profile->file.trans.table[0] is not permitted if profile->file.trans.size == 0,
is it?
Did you mean index >= profile->file.trans.size ?
> AA_ERROR("Invalid named transition\n");
> return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> }
> name = profile->file.trans.table[index];
(...snipped...)
> } else if (*name == ':') {
> /* switching namespace */
> const char *ns_name = name + 1;
> name = xname = ns_name + strlen(ns_name) + 1;
> if (!*xname)
Isn't *xname undefined because it is beyond '\0'?
> /* no name so use profile name */
> xname = profile->fqname;
(...snipped...)
> } else if (*name == '@') {
> /* TODO: variable support */
>
You want "continue;" here in order to avoid doing strstr(NULL, "//")
inside aa_find_profile().
> } else {
> int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> {
> struct aa_task_context *cxt;
> struct aa_profile *profile, *new_profile = NULL;
> struct aa_namespace *ns;
> char *buffer = NULL;
> unsigned int state = DFA_START;
> struct path_cond cond = {
> bprm->file->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_uid,
> bprm->file->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode
> };
> struct aa_audit_file sa = {
> .base.operation = "exec",
> .base.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> .request = MAY_EXEC,
> .cond = &cond,
> };
>
> sa.base.error = cap_bprm_set_creds(bprm);
> if (sa.base.error)
> return sa.base.error;
>
> if (bprm->cred_prepared)
> return 0;
>
> cxt = bprm->cred->security;
> BUG_ON(!cxt);
>
> profile = aa_confining_profile(cxt->sys.profile);
> ns = profile->ns;
aa_confining_profile() may return NULL.
According to apparmor-kermic tree, it is
ns = cxt->sys.profile->ns;
>
> /* buffer freed below, name is pointer inside of buffer */
> sa.base.error = aa_get_name(&bprm->file->f_path, 0, &buffer,
> (char **)&sa.name);
> if (sa.base.error) {
> if (!profile || profile->flags & PFLAG_IX_ON_NAME_ERROR)
> sa.base.error = 0;
> sa.base.info = "Exec failed name resolution";
> sa.name = bprm->filename;
> goto audit;
> }
>
> if (!profile) {
> /* unconfined task - attach profile if one matches */
> new_profile = aa_sys_find_attach(&ns->base, sa.name);
> if (!new_profile)
> goto cleanup;
> goto apply;
> } else if (cxt->sys.onexec) {
> /*
> * onexec permissions are stored in a pair, rewalk the
> * dfa to get start of the exec path match.
> */
> sa.perms = change_profile_perms(profile, cxt->sys.onexec->ns,
> sa.name, &state);
> state = aa_dfa_null_transition(profile->file.dfa, state);
> }
> sa.perms = aa_str_perms(profile->file.dfa, state, sa.name, &cond, NULL);>
> if (cxt->sys.onexec && sa.perms.allowed & AA_MAY_ONEXEC) {
> new_profile = cxt->sys.onexec;
> cxt->sys.onexec = NULL;
> sa.base.info = "change_profile onexec";
> } else if (sa.perms.allowed & MAY_EXEC) {
> new_profile = x_to_profile(ns, profile, sa.name,
> sa.perms.xindex);
> if (IS_ERR(new_profile)) {
> if (sa.perms.xindex & AA_X_INHERIT) {
> /* (p|c|n)ix - don't change profile */
> sa.base.info = "ix fallback";
> goto x_clear;
> } else if (sa.perms.xindex & AA_X_UNCONFINED) {
> new_profile = aa_get_profile(ns->unconfined);
> sa.base.info = "ux fallback";
IS_ERR(new_profile) is true but new_profile == NULL is false.
What I worry is that you sometimes embed error values into pointer but you
are sometimes checking only NULL.
> } else {
> sa.base.error = PTR_ERR(new_profile);
> if (sa.base.error == -ENOENT)
> sa.base.info = "profile not found";
> new_profile = NULL;
> }
> }
> } else if (PROFILE_COMPLAIN(profile)) {
> new_profile = aa_alloc_null_profile(profile, 0);
> sa.base.error = -EACCES;
> if (!new_profile)
> sa.base.error = -ENOMEM;
> sa.name2 = new_profile->fqname;
This will oops if new_profile == NULL. Please fix apparmor-karmic as well.
> sa.perms.xindex |= AA_X_UNSAFE;
> } else {
> sa.base.error = -EACCES;
> }
>
> if (!new_profile)
> goto audit;
You want to do
if (!new_profile || IS_ERR(new_profile))
rather than
if (!new_profile)
Please fix apparmor-karmic as well.
>
> if (profile == new_profile) {
> aa_put_profile(new_profile);
aa_put_profile() with error pointer, which will be fixed by above change.
> goto audit;
> }
>
> if (bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_SHARE) {
> /* FIXME: currently don't mediate shared state */
> ;
> }
>
> if (bprm->unsafe & (LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE | LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE_CAP)) {
> sa.base.error = aa_may_change_ptraced_domain(current,
> new_profile);
aa_may_change_ptraced_domain() with error pointer, which will be fixed by
above change.
> if (sa.base.error)
> goto audit;
> }
>
> /* Determine if secure exec is needed.
> * Can be at this point for the following reasons:
> * 1. unconfined switching to confined
> * 2. confined switching to different confinement
> * 3. confined switching to unconfined
> *
> * Cases 2 and 3 are marked as requiring secure exec
> * (unless policy specified "unsafe exec")
> *
> * bprm->unsafe is used to cache the AA_X_UNSAFE permission
> * to avoid having to recompute in secureexec
> */
> if (!(sa.perms.xindex & AA_X_UNSAFE))
> bprm->unsafe |= AA_SECURE_X_NEEDED;
>
> apply:
> sa.name2 = new_profile->fqname;
error pointer, which will be fixed by above change.
> /* When switching namespace ensure its part of audit message */
> if (new_profile->ns != ns)
> sa.name3 = new_profile->ns->base.name;
>
> /* when transitioning profiles clear unsafe personality bits */
> bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
>
> aa_put_profile(cxt->sys.profile);
> /* transfer new profile reference will be released when cxt is freed */
> cxt->sys.profile = new_profile;
>
> x_clear:
> aa_put_profile(cxt->sys.previous);
> aa_put_profile(cxt->sys.onexec);
> cxt->sys.previous = NULL;
> cxt->sys.onexec = NULL;
> cxt->sys.token = 0;
>
> audit:
> sa.base.error = aa_audit_file(profile, &sa);
aa_audit_file() might return 0 if PROFILE_COMPLAIN(profile) == true even if
sa.base.error != 0 . I think regarding execve(), we should not ignore errors
like -EACCES, -ENOMEM etc. if something went wrong before auditing.
Otherwise, current process might continue execve() with unexpected profile.
>
> cleanup:
> kfree(buffer);
>
> return sa.base.error;
> }
> int aa_change_hat(const char *hat_name, u64 token, int permtest)
(...snipped...)
> /* freed below */
> name = new_compound_name(root->fqname, hat_name);
>
Audit log lacks "name=%s" part if name == NULL.
> sa.name = name;
> sa.base.info = "hat not found";
> sa.base.error = -ENOENT;
> int aa_change_profile(const char *ns_name, const char *fqname, int onexec,
> int permtest)
(...snipped...)
> /* released below */
> target = aa_find_profile(ns, fqname);
> if (!target) {
> sa.base.info = "profile not found";
> sa.base.error = -ENOENT;
> if (permtest || !PROFILE_COMPLAIN(profile))
> goto audit;
> /* release below */
> target = aa_alloc_null_profile(profile, 0);
aa_alloc_null_profile() will oops if profile == NULL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists