[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B073E59.2000808@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:11:53 -0500
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] jump label v3 - x86: Introduce generic jump patching
without stop_machine
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Jason Baron (jbaron@...hat.com) wrote:
>> Add text_poke_fixup() which takes a fixup address to where a processor
>> jumps if it hits the modifying address while code modifying.
>> text_poke_fixup() does following steps for this purpose.
>>
>> 1. Setup int3 handler for fixup.
>> 2. Put a breakpoint (int3) on the first byte of modifying region,
>> and synchronize code on all CPUs.
>> 3. Modify other bytes of modifying region, and synchronize code on all CPUs.
>> 4. Modify the first byte of modifying region, and synchronize code
>> on all CPUs.
>> 5. Clear int3 handler.
>>
>
> Hi Masami,
>
> I like the approach and the API is clean. I have intersped comments
> below.
>
> Ingo: I raise a question about text_mutex vs on_each_cpu hangs I
> experienced recently in the message below. Might be worth having a look,
> I suspect this might have caused the hangs Paul McKenney had with his
> past TREE RCU callback migration. I think he did take a mutex in the cpu
> hotplug callbacks and might have used IPIs within that same lock.
Hi Mathieu,
I guess that the hang might happen as below;
----
lock text_mutex
modify code
on_each_cpu(do_something)
cpu-hotplug (down)
lock cpu-hotplug mutex
online_cpus is changed
native_cpu_die()
->alternatives_smp_switch(0)
->lock text_mutex -> sleep
(wait for offlined cpu...)
----
If this is correct, I think we can fix it as below.
----
lock cpu-hotplug mutex
lock text_mutex
modify code
on_each_cpu(do_something)
unlock text_mutex
unlock cpu-hotplug mutex
cpu-hotplug (down)
lock cpu-hotplug mutex
online_cpus is changed
native_cpu_die()
->alternatives_smp_switch(0)
->lock text_mutex
modify code
unlock text_mutex
...
unlock cpu-hotplug mutex
----
Or,
----
lock text_mutex
modify code
unlock text_mutex
on_each_cpu(do_something)
cpu-hotplug (down)
lock cpu-hotplug mutex
online_cpus is changed
native_cpu_die()
->alternatives_smp_switch(0)
->lock text_mutex
modify code
unlock text_mutex
...
unlock cpu-hotplug mutex
----
The latter needs another mutex for int3 handler and
frequently mutex_lock/unlock in this patch.
Hmm?
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists