linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] x86/apic: limit irq affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1r5rrr9v5.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:49:50 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86/apic: limit irq affinity

Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com> writes:

> This patch allows for hard numa restrictions to irq affinity on x86 systems.
>
> Affinity is masked to allow only those cpus which the subarchitecture
> deems accessible by the given irq.
>
> On some UV systems, this domain will be limited to the nodes accessible
> to the irq's node.  Initially other X86 systems will not mask off any cpus
> so non-UV systems will remain unaffected.

Is this a hardware restriction you are trying to model?
If not this seems wrong.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/