[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091122021128.db47e202.isloginov@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:11:28 +0300
From: Ilya Loginov <isloginov@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Horton <phorton@...box.co.uk>,
"Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@...aid.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: fix mtd_blkdevs problem with caches on some
architectures (2.6.31)
> The one somewhat fragile thing is that we'll end up in a situation
> where an architecture could implement a real flush_dcache_page(), but
> would forget to set SOMETHING_LIKE_CONFIG_CPU_HAS_DCACHE_ALIAS. Or
> vice versa. To make things reliable it would be good to cause a
> compilation failure in that case.
Yes, I do understand this.
> One way of addressing this is to
>
> - change every arch/*/include/asm/cacheflush.h to include
> asm-generic/cacheflush.h
>
> - put #ifndef SOMETHING_LIKE_CONFIG_CPU_HAS_DCACHE_ALIAS wrappers
> around all content in asm-generic/cacheflush
>
> So it the above mistake happens, we'll get lots of duplicated
> definitions, or no definitions at all (I think).
Actually I don't think that it is the best solution. Let me explain.
1) The problem is that flush_dcache_page is defined for a bunch of
different architectures. (x86, ia64, etc). But in most of the cases
flush_dcache_page is empty, but should be defined anyway. Just see the
review:
h8300 -- empty. All cache defines like asm-generic, but worse
(without do {} while(0)).
blackfin -- empty for architectures which do not define
CONFIG_BFIN_EXTMEM_WRITEBACK or CONFIG_BFIN_L2_WRITEBACK.
frv
x86 -- empty. All cache defines like asm-generic, but it was
implemented throught inline.
ia64
sh -- in case if ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_KERNEL_DCACHE_PAGE was defined
most flash operations are empty, but there no this define anywhere in
kernel.
alpha -- empty, like most cache operations.
avr32 -- empty. But many other operations are defined.
arm
sparc
powerpc
m32r -- empty for all chips, like most kernel operations.
microblaze -- empty.
cris -- empty. cacheflush is equal to asm-generic, except
define change_page_attr function.
s390 -- empty. cacheflush is equal to asm-generic, except
define kernel_map_pages function if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC was defined.
mips -- different for different boards and architectures.
parisc
mn10300 -- empty. But there are functions like
mn10300_dcache_flush_page. I think this is bad.
m68k -- empty if __uClinux__ is using.
xtensa -- empty if DCACHE_WAY_SIZE < PAGE_SIZE
So you see, it is a real mess. Only in 8 of 20 architectures
this call don't empty!
2) In the asm-generic/cacheflush.h also was defined a lot of functions
that could have a conflict and we don't want to have this conflict
anyway. So we will meet here the same problem that was described in you
letter:
> we'll get lots of duplicated
> definitions, or no definitions at all
3) I want to mention that flush_dcache_page depends on the type of
process and chipset as well, so in order to make such things workable
developers usually set different flags in Kconfig. For example
SYS_HAS_EARLY_PRINTK or DMA_NONCOHERENT. And this is the most effective
way of doing this, as far as I see this.
I've just checked most of the places in the kernel where
flush_dcache_page is used. See the summary:
1)
drivers/staging/rspiusb/rspiusb.c
for (i = 0; i < pdx->maplist_numPagesMapped[frameInfo]; i++)
flush_dcache_page(maplist_p[i]);
2)(is equal to 3))
fs/reiserfs/super.c
fs/reiserfs/inode.c
fs/ufs/super.c
fs/ext2/super.c
fs/nilfs2/mdt.c
fs/jfs/super.c
fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c
fs/ext3/super.c
fs/ext4/super.c
This operation is executed into a loop (big enought).
flush_dcache_page(bh->b_page);
3)
in all other cases there is
flush_dcache_page(page);
4)*
fs/bio.c
mm/bounce.c
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
These files call flush_dcache_page in bio_for_each_segment. But
there are another work. So we have no pointless empty loops.
I think we should select SYS_HAS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE for those
architectures which requires it(to fix the bug) (and implement empty
flush_dcache_page throught inline like in x86(to avoid pointless do
{} while(0))).
What do you think about this?
--
Ilya Loginov <isloginov@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists