[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091122023659.a9cf6980.isloginov@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:36:59 +0300
From: Ilya Loginov <isloginov@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Horton <phorton@...box.co.uk>,
"Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@...aid.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: fix mtd_blkdevs problem with caches on some
architectures (2.6.31)
> And then, in a .c file:
>
> #ifndef ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE
> #error "you lose"
> #endif
>
> and, of course:
>
> #if ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE
> <implement real code>
> #else
> <implement empty stubs>
> #endif
>
>
> This way
>
> a) the definition site for ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE is
> right next to the definition site for flush_dcache_page(), instead
> of being in some random remote file and
>
> b) people can't forget to implement ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE.
>
>
> Generally we prefer to avoid defining ARCH_HAS_FOO in header files and
> we prefer to control the definition in Kconfig. But it sounds like we
> have a special case here..
>
I agree. I think this is the best way. I will rewrite the patch.
Thank you!
--
Ilya Loginov <isloginov@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists