linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (pohmelfs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091121112346.GC23974@ioremap.net>
Date:	Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:23:46 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks (pohmelfs)

Hi.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:53:17AM +0800, Wu Fengguang (fengguang.wu@...el.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:11:54PM +0800, Wu Fengguang (fengguang.wu@...el.com) wrote:
> > > Will you pick up this updated patch? It also removes the unused bdi.
> > 
> > I'm ok with the changes, but I suppose it should be pushed as a single
> > patchet into the tree, no?
> 
> Either way works. I would submit a single patchset that includes the
> generic ones and the fs specific patches that have not been picked up
> into their fs tree :)

Please push it within your patchset to eliminate merge dependencies if
any. Thank you.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/