[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091122165321.GA19922@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:53:21 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] rcu: resend of grace-period stall and
cleanup patches
Hello!
This patch series is a resend of the three RCU patches that are candidates
for the upcoming 2.6.33 merge window, but that are not yet in -tip.
These are:
1. A fix for a grace-period-stall bug that occurs on large
machines. This was partially fixed by commit 237c80c5,
and this patch completes the fix using a much cleaner
method. 237c80c5 would request another quiescent state
for a CPU that just went offline and that might have already
gone through a quiescent state for the current grace period.
In contrast, this patch pushes the quiescent-state reporting
up the rcu_node tree straightaway.
2. A cleanup removing function wrapping that has been unnecessary
since commit e74f4c45 caused CPUs going offline to give up
their own callbacks.
3. A cleanup that gets rid of a few annoying #ifdefs by moving
the code from kernel/rcupdate.c and include/linux/rcupdate.h
to include/linux/rcutiny.h, include/linux/rcutree.h, and
kernel/rcutree.c.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists