[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911221817200.24119@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:49:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, indexer@...ernode.on.net,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
Switched to email. Please reply by mail (reply-to-all) and not in the
bugzilla.
> --- Comment #1 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> 2009-11-21 20:17:21 ---
> Caused by:
>
> commit 7bd867dfb4e0357e06a3211ab2bd0e714110def3
That's completely bogus. That commit is not in 2.6.31. It was merged in the
2.6.32 merge window.
>From the original bug report:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125846988820120&w=4
> I would like to report a possible regression in efi.c with kernels
> 2.6.31 , 2.6.32-rc5 and 2.6.32.rc7.
>
> Attempting to boot x86_64 with elilo succeeds using 2.6.30 . Using the
> same config cannot boot with any of the 3 afore mentioned kernels.
So the problem exists with 2.6.31 already which excludes the above
commit.
The above commit indeed caused problems on 64bit efi systems in
2.6.32-rc. The fix was merged between 32-rc5 and 32-rc6.
The bisect was done with:
git bisect start
# good: [59a3759d0fe8d969888c741bb33f4946e4d3750d] Linux 2.6.30-rc7
git bisect good 59a3759d0fe8d969888c741bb33f4946e4d3750d
# bad: [156171c71a0dc4bce12b4408bb1591f8fe32dc1a] Linux 2.6.32-rc7
while the bisect should have be done with
good 2.6.30
bad 2.6.31
William, could you please go through the bisect pain again?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists