linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched: add the other missing clock update to migrate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:14:49 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: add the other missing clock update to
 migrate_task()

On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 17:58 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 14:16 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > We should make double_rq_lock() and double_lock_balance() behave
> > equivalent wrt update_rq_clock().
> > 
> > Current, depending on CONFIG_PREEMPT, double_lock_balance() already
> > updates both rq clocks.
> 
> Hm, right.  Better plan.

Oops, nope.  Consistency is still a good plan, however, that update is
still needed, because it's the case where we're _not_ going to use the
migration thread.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/