[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091122082511.GC24558@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:25:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Put printk buffer in video ram
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:05:06AM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > After doing some successful debugging by placing printk buffer in video
> > ram, here I publish cleaned version of it.
> >
> > I discovered that on my system video ram isn't cleared on reboot, and I
> > took advantage of that by placing printk buffer directly there.
> > This allows to capture oopses/panicks almost from everywhere.
> > It is also very simple to setup.
The idea is very, very nice!
If implemented cleanly and with a few more usability fixes this could be
a killer feature for laptop debugging. Persistent storage across reboots
- that's really nice.
( It wont help us debug crashes that require a power cycle - so it
probably will not help with s2ram failure debugging - but still it
widens the scope of printk based logging to critical crash scenarios:
early bootup crashes can be debugged via it and panics can be debugged
via it as well - as long as panic_timeout still works. )
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim Levitsky
> >
> > ---
> >
> > >From 77e0f4ffc531417d54ce928ade8481d82192b012 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
> > Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:49:04 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] printk: Allow to store log buffer into video memory
> >
> > This patch adds new kernel parameter printk_address=
> > that will allow it to store the printk buffer in arbitary
> > (I/O) memory address.
> >
> > If you own a system that has discrete video ram, and it
> > isn't cleared automatically by BIOS on reboot, you
> > can use this as a black box recorder of crashes.
> >
> > If debugfs is enabled, log of last boot is copied into
> > system ram, and can be accessed via debugfs, for example
> > cat /sys/kernel/debug/printk/crash_dmesg
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/printk.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 31 ++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
>
> kernel/printk.c does not seem to be the right place to do that
> but rather in a specific console driver.
> I would rather see it as an early console (for early printk), beside ttyS,
> vga and usb debug ports.
>
> Also, instead of creating another debugfs entry, you could just
> trigger the trace to the ftrace ring buffer, using trace_printk()
> for example.
>
> Hm?
>
> I personally would like to see such feature as I have no serial line
> in my laptop, although I'm not sure my graphical card would be happy
> with that...
I'd like to make it easy for distros to pipe regular printk's into this
buffer as well - and not tie it to some hassle-to-set-up early printk
mechanism. (early printk should tie into it too, to make it easier to
debug early crashes. User first boots into a kernel that crashes - then
can 'recover' the crashlog on a known-good kernel.)
But i agree with your observation that the hw dependent bits should not
go into kernel/printk.c - but this could be done cleanly at the console
driver level and be added to the VGA driver.
It should probably also tie into KMS/GEM to make sure it does not stomp
over video RAM that the GX driver might be using.
Furthermore, the printk_address=xyz boot parameter is way too difficult
for users to get right. This should be done as automatically as possible
- and the 'previous' printk buffer should be dumped into the 'next'
printk buffer during bootup. (preserving it for the regular syslog in a
compatible way and for kerneloops, etc.)
Creating a new /sys output channel just delays the adoption of such a
feature forever. It should be part of the printk infrastructure,
enable-able via a .config option but automatic otherwise.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists