[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B09196D.7040107@simon.arlott.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:58:53 +0000
From: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cxacru usb_bulk_msg() firmware upload 36x slower with OHCI vs.
UHCI
On 18/11/09 22:25, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Simon Arlott wrote:
>> > What happens with other sorts of devices, such as a USB flash drive?
>>
>> I can write a 10MB file to an USB flash drive over OHCI, and umount+sync
>> takes around 13 seconds.
>
> Yes, that's about right. It leads me to wonder if something funny is
> going on with the device, or least with the firmware-loading part of
> it. Odd that it works differently with UHCI and OHCI, though. There
> shouldn't be any differences visible to the device. You don't have
> anything else attached to the same bus, do you?
Yes, but not in use and I could disconnect everything to test it.
core/hcd.c has an interesting comment in usb_hcd_check_unlink_urb():
/* The USB 2.0 spec says 256 ms. This is close enough and won't
* exceed that limit if HZ is 100. The math is more clunky than
* maybe expected, this is to make sure that all timers for USB devices
* fire at the same time to give the CPU a break inbetween */
I'll try increasing the frequency of this timer too.
--
Simon Arlott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists