[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:48:56 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, awalls@...ix.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, avi@...hat.com,
johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue,
take#2
Hello,
11/21/2009 09:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> I'm pushing out 0001-0014 to linux-next via the following tree.
The sched fix patch hasn't showed up in upstream so I didn't do it
yet.
>> I intend to keep the tree stable from this point on unless drastic
>> change is necessary. I'll posting further patches against the above
>> tree.
>
> 05 is a full nak and needs reimplementing.
> 06 at the very least needs a changelog.
Alright, one more round to go then.
Thanks for reviewing.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists