[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091123102528.GT31961@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:55:28 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Spencer Candland <spencer@...ehost.com>,
Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix granularity of task_u/stime(), v2
* Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com> [2009-11-23 11:09:26]:
[snip]
> +
> + utime = task_utime(tsk);
> + stime = task_stime(tsk);
> + if (tsk->utime > utime || tsk->stime > stime) {
> + utime = tsk->utime;
> + stime = tsk->stime;
> + }
Won't this condition be problematic, since it can reset stime
when tsk->utime > utime for example?
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists