[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091123114845.GC25575@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:48:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Robert Swan <swan.r.l@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bisected] pty performance problem
* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c
> > index 66fa4e1..92a0864 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c
> > @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ void tty_flip_buffer_push(struct tty_struct *tty)
> > if (tty->low_latency)
> > flush_to_ldisc(&tty->buf.work.work);
> > else
> > - schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 1);
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 0);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_flip_buffer_push);
>
> Another possibility is to do
>
> if (tty->low_latency)
> schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 0);
> else
> schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 1);
Flaggery for low latency is kind of lame though - especially if it
defaults to off in most drivers as you say.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists