[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1my2em0ja.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:34:49 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: crash kernel reserve with reserve_early -v2
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> writes:
> use find_e820_area/reserve_early instead.
>
> -v2: address Eric's request, to restore original semantics.
> will fail, if the provided address can not be used.
This patch seems reasonable.
YH what is the benefit of using reserve_early, and moving
reserve_crashkernel earlier?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists