[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091123195415.GA16833@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:54:15 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
David Zeuthen <david@...ar.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle
changes
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:50:00PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> If the polling works out, then yes that approach is certainly a lot
> better from a performance impact pov.
>
> What kind of time intervals are you targetting?
On the order of a second. I'm doing benchmarking with my current
implementation now, I'll let you know how it looks.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists