[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911232107.22868.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:07:22 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pata_hpt37x: add proper cable detection methods
On Monday 23 November 2009 08:42:23 pm Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> > Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c
> > @@ -303,6 +303,59 @@ static unsigned long hpt370a_filter(stru
>
> As this driver still carries a version info, don't we need to update it?
While doing the previously mentioned PATA rework I've looked at
the ratio of patches actually updating version numbers and not
doing so. This lead me to the same conclusions as with version
numbers in IDE drivers previously..
However this is just my opinion so if you for some reason would
like to bump version numbers of some drivers I won't complain..
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists