[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3r5rpq818.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:51:31 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mario Limonciello <superm1@...ntu.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> writes:
> Curreently the "scan" codes in the input layer serve just to help users
> to map whatever the device emits into a proper input event code so that
> the rest of userspace would not have to care and would work with all
> types of devices (USB, PS/2, etc).
>
> I would not want to get to the point where the raw codes are used as a
> primary data source.
The "key" interface is not flexible enough at present.
> Again, I would prefer to keep EV_KEY/KEY_* as the primary event type for
> keys and buttons on all devices.
Primary, I think so.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists