[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091123212525.GE15547@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:25:25 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf tools: Add support for breakpoint events in
perf tools
Em Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:09:39PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:25:28PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> > > I think we should find this symbol length from userspace. I'm not sure
> > > how yet, probably using Dwarf. Arnaldo, do you have an idea about that?
> >
> > DWARF has the type for each variable or struct member, getting its size
> > is straightforward.
>
> Ok.
>
> > Using just /proc/kallsyms all we can do is find the size of a variable
> > by looking at its address and the address of the next one.
>
> Hmm, but I worry a bit about alignment which would return us
> the wrong size.
>
> May be can we first try to get the address from /proc/kallsyms,
> and if we have dwarf, get the size from it, otherwise try some
> magic with /proc/kallsysms...
Yeah, I'll get the variables-from-kallsyms bit just after I get a new
mechanism for expressing configuration for the perf symbol resolving
machinery.
Should have this done ASAP.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists