linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers and big packets in virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200911240854.24054.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:23 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers and big packets in virtio_net

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:37:01 am Shirley Ma wrote:
> > > +             skb = (struct sk_buff *)buf;
> > This cast is unnecessary, but a comment would be nice:
> 
> Without this cast there is a compile warning. 

Hi Shirley,

   Looks like buf is a void *, so no cast should be necessary.  But I could
be reading the patch wrong.

> > However, I question whether making it 16 byte is the right thing: the
> > ethernet header is 14 bytes long, so don't we want 8 bytes of padding?
> 
> Because in QEMU it requires 10 bytes header in a separately, so one page
> is used to share between virtio_net_hdr header which is 10 bytes head
> and rest of data. So I put 6 bytes offset here between two buffers. I
> didn't look at the reason why a seperate buf is used for virtio_net_hdr
> in QEMU.

It's a qemu bug.  It insists the header be an element in the scatterlist by
itself.  Unfortunately we have to accommodate it.

However, there's no reason for the merged rxbuf and big packet layout to be
the same: for the big packet case you should layout as follows:

#define BIG_PACKET_PAD (NET_SKB_PAD - sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr) + NET_IP_ALIGN)
struct big_packet_page {
	struct virtio_net_hdr hdr;
	char pad[BIG_PACKET_PAD];
	/* Actual packet data starts here */
	unsigned char data[PAGE_SIZE - BIG_PACKET_PAD - sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr)];
};

Then use this type as the template for registering the sg list for the
big packet case.

> > I think you can move the memcpy outside the if, like so:
> > 
> >         memcpy(&hdr, p, hdr_len);
> 
> I didn't move it out, because num_buf = hdr->mhdr.num_buffers;

Yes, that has to stay inside, but the memcpy can move out.  It's just a bit
neater to have more common code.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/