linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091124103641.abd7bd6b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:36:41 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23

Hi Randy,

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:04:39 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> I decided to check on linux-next (only checked x86_64 allmodconfig),
> and viola:
> 
> CONFIG_STAGING=y
> CONFIG_STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD=y
> 
> That is just too helpful.  :(

The Kconfig was deliberately done so that the all{no,yes,mod}config
builds don't build the staging stuff.  You need to explictly ask for it.
Otherwise I would spend all my time reporting/fixing errors and warnings
in linux-next.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped