[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6801.1259046382@jrobl>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:06:22 +0900
From: hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q, slab, kmemleak_erase() and redzone?
Pekka Enberg:
> We are setting an element in the per CPU array to NULL so the the
> kmemleak code in ____cache_alloc() is safe. Red-zoning is done at the
> _object_ which is not touched by kmemleak. Looking at the oops, it
> does seem likely that you have a bug in your module (or in some other
> part of the kernel).
Thanks for reply.
In ____cache_alloc(), the variable 'ac' is assigned before
cache_alloc_refill() call, and it is used for the parameter of
kmemleak_erase(). The value may be changed by cache_alloc_refill(),
isn't it?
In this case, kmemleak_erase() receives the incorrect pointer and sets
NULL to somewhere else which may be redzone?
How about this fix?
If cpu_cache_get() call is heavy and we cannot ignore it when KMEMLEAK
is disabled, then a new wrapper may be necessary.
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 71e0a1f..3f3e018 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3104,6 +3104,7 @@ static inline void *____cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
} else {
STATS_INC_ALLOCMISS(cachep);
objp = cache_alloc_refill(cachep, flags);
+ ac = cpu_cache_get(cachep);
}
/*
* To avoid a false negative, if an object that is in one of the
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists