[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b0bdf36.1818d00a.07cc.25ae@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:27:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, eranian@...gle.com,
eranian@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] perf_events: fix validate_event bug
The validate_event() was failing on valid event
combinations. The function was assuming that if
x86_schedule_event() returned 0, it meant error.
But x86_schedule_event() returns the counter index
and 0 is a perfectly valid value. An error is returned
if the function returns a negative value.
Furthermore, validate_event() was also failing for
event groups because the event->pmu was not set until
after hw_perf_event_init().
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index bd87430..c1bbed1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -2229,10 +2229,10 @@ validate_event(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
{
struct hw_perf_event fake_event = event->hw;
- if (event->pmu != &pmu)
+ if (event->pmu && event->pmu != &pmu)
return 0;
- return x86_schedule_event(cpuc, &fake_event);
+ return x86_schedule_event(cpuc, &fake_event) >= 0;
}
static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists