[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911241449.02473.czoccolo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:49:02 +0100
From: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
To: "Linux-Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic
An incoming no-idle queue should preempt the active no-idle queue
only if the active queue is idling due to service tree empty.
Previous code was buggy in two ways:
* it relied on service_tree field to be set on the active queue, while
it is not set when the code is idling for a new request
* it didn't check for the service tree empty condition, so could lead to
LIFO behaviour if multiple queues with depth > 1 were preempting each
other on an non-NCQ device.
Reported-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 6925ab9..2a304f4 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -2401,8 +2401,9 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq))
return true;
- if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD
- && new_cfqq->service_tree == cfqq->service_tree)
+ if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
+ cfqq_type(new_cfqq) == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
+ new_cfqq->service_tree->count == 1)
return true;
/*
--
1.6.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists