[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1259072207.22249.1066.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:16:47 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:tracing/core] ring-buffer benchmark: Run
producer/consumer threads at nice +19
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 07:15 +0000, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Commit-ID: 98e4833ba3c314c99dc364012fba6ac894230ad0
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/98e4833ba3c314c99dc364012fba6ac894230ad0
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:03:09 +0100
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CommitDate: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:03:09 +0100
>
> ring-buffer benchmark: Run producer/consumer threads at nice +19
>
> The ring-buffer benchmark threads run on nice 0 by default, using
> up a lot of CPU time and slowing down the system:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 1024 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 95.3 0.0 4:01.67 rb_producer
> 1023 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 93.5 0.0 2:54.33 rb_consumer
> 21569 mingo 40 0 14852 1048 772 R 3.6 0.1 0:00.05 top
> 1 root 40 0 4080 928 668 S 0.0 0.0 0:23.98 init
>
> Renice them to +19 to make them less intrusive.
Ingo, that is the point of a benchmark!
This module is not made to be run all the time. I know you do it for
testing. But running it at lowest priority kills the reason this module
was made in the first place!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists