[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091124065022.6933be1a@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:50:22 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86/apic: limit irq affinity
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:55:15 +0100 (CET)
> > Furthermore, the /sysfs topology information should include IRQ
> > routing data in this case.
>
> Hmm, not sure about that. You'd need to scan through all the nodes to
> find the set of CPUs where an irq can be routed to. I prefer to have
> the information exposed by the irq enumeration (which is currently in
> /proc/irq though).
yes please.
one device can have multiple irqs
one irq can be servicing multiple devices
expressing that in sysfs is a nightmare, while
sticking it in /proc/irq *where the rest of the info is* is
much nicer for apps like irqbalance
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists